DOVER, Del. -- Gambling revenues, once a mere trickle, have become a critical stream of income in a number of states, in some cases surpassing traditional sources like the corporate income tax and helping states lower personal income or property taxes.
The sums are so alluring that some officials are concerned that their states are becoming as addicted as problem gamblers. "We're drunk on gambling revenue," said Wayne Smith, the Republican who is House majority leader in the Delaware Legislature. "Gambling revenues are like free money."
In Rhode Island, South Dakota, Louisiana and Oregon, not to mention Nevada, taxes from casinos, slot machines at racetracks and lotteries make up more than 10 percent of overall revenue, according to a new report. In five other states -- Delaware, West Virginia, Indiana, Iowa and Mississippi -- gambling revenues are fast approaching 10 percent.
So vital has the money become that in Rhode Island, gambling revenue has now surpassed the corporate income tax to become the state's third largest source of income, after the personal income and sales tax. It has enabled the state to avoid raising its income tax for 10 years.
Because of gambling, South Dakota officials a decade ago were able to push through a 20 percent reduction in property taxes by increasing the state's share of gambling revenues from video lottery terminals to 50 percent, up from 37 percent.
A property tax reduction was also the main argument in Pennsylvania for legalizing gambling when the Legislature last year authorized slot machines at racetracks and casinos after years of intense opposition.
But most states that have come to rely on gambling revenue, now face a danger -- competition from nearby states for the same dollars.
Some 70 percent of gambling revenue in Delaware's three "racinos" (racetracks with video slot machines), comes from visitors from Pennsylvania and Maryland, according to the Delaware Department of Finance. But Pennsylvania legalized slot machines last year, and the Maryland Legislature is debating a bill to legalize gambling there.
If Pennsylvania and Maryland install all the slot machines they are considering, Delaware could lose $120 million annually, almost 5 percent of total state revenues, said Tom Cook, a spokesman for the Department of Finance.
Similar dilemmas are cropping up around the country now that 48 states, with the exception of Utah and Hawaii, have legalized some form of gambling.
There is concern in Rhode Island that Massachusetts, the source of many customers at Rhode Island's racinos, will legalize slot machines at its own racetracks, and within an hour's drive of Providence, the large American Indian-owned casinos in Connecticut are expanding.
"We're in a Catch-22 situation, with out third largest revenue source being surrounded by these other gambling facilities," said Joseph A. Montalbano, the president of the Rhode Island state Senate.
South Dakota first legalized gambling for a limited purpose -- allowing casinos in the decaying frontier town of Deadwood to try to preserve it.
But South Dakota now gets $112.8 million a year from gambling, most of it from video slot machines in bars all over the state. Gambling accounts for 13.2 percent of South Dakota's revenue.
In 2000, worried about an increase in divorces, crime and suicide among problem gamblers, David Knudson, a Republican state senator from Sioux Falls, supported a ballot issue to repeal the law legalizing the state lottery video slot machines. But many legislators argued the state would have to come up with alternative sources of money, Knudson said, and the measure was defeated.
Knudson noted that gambling opponents often cite the danger of addiction for individual gamblers, but "the biggest addict turns out to be the state government that becomes dependent on it."
Copyright C 2005 Deseret News Publishing Co.
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.